Save the 1 Speaker Websites
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
You’re glad I’m here? by Nick D'Angelo
Pro-Choice
Student: Are you still pro-life in cases of rape?
Nick: Yes, I
don’t see the crimes of a father as justification for abortion.
Pro-Choice
Student: The kid is just going to be a painful reminder for the
mother and detrimental to society.
Nick: Well,
I was conceived in date-rape.
Pro-Choice
Student: Oh….Well, I’m glad you’re
here.
I have heard it multiple times in various situations, “Oh…I’m
glad you’re here.” This comes immediately after I’ve shared with
someone who professes a pro-choice stance, using rape or another hard case as
their silver bullet; that I was conceived in date-rape. The statement has
always confused and bothered me, and here are 5 reasons why.
1: First of all, it is not
a matter of “here” vs “there”; it is a matter of alive or killed in my most
vulnerable state.
This common word choice is a symptom of the hedging done to preserve the moral
superiority assertion within the argument. If the arguer wishes to maintain the
status of loving people, and for that reason advocating abortion, they must
somehow provide exemptions and softened word choice when dealing with me, a
person to be aborted under their paradigm, in front of them.
2: You are not actually glad I’m here but feel
socially awkward saying disparaging comments to someone in front of you.
I suppose I appreciate the pretense but I think a far more important
conversation would be had without it. Are you not glad I’m here because I
disagree with you on this very sensitive subject?
I understand how one could become defensive with such topics but I think this attitude stands directly against the culture of tolerance my opposition tends to preach. Please have a real conversation with me, let me know your honest reservations and genuine concerns; personal and societal growth can’t occur without it.
I understand how one could become defensive with such topics but I think this attitude stands directly against the culture of tolerance my opposition tends to preach. Please have a real conversation with me, let me know your honest reservations and genuine concerns; personal and societal growth can’t occur without it.
3: You are truly glad I’m
alive because of the condition of my life.
This
is rather subjective and wholly inconsistent with the rest of the pro-choice
rhetoric. The rape exception is used to highlight the struggles both the mother
and child may have as a product of the conception circumstances: financial,
emotional, legal, social, educational and boundless others. Therefore, what
makes me valuable? Is it because I graduated college that I am valuable to you?
Is it because of the wonderful relationship I have with my mother? Is it
because I am an employed contributor to society? Is it because I am not a
felon? Valuing a life based on such arbitrary and subjective conditions
ultimately states that I only matter if _____ is true. Are you willing to say
that I’m valuable because I fit your criteria instead of having inherent worth?
Are you willing to tell others the opposite?
4: You are truly glad I’m alive but still hold
the stance that abortion is a woman’s choice by right.
If you are pro-choice: The
expression of happiness/gladness in this situation, if not affected by the
conditional reasoning in #3, implies preference. If you are happy I am alive,
you would therefore be unhappy if I was aborted. If abortion is therefore the
morally inferior or at least less preferred choice, why would you openly
support the inferior choice? What about the choice to abort when gender
selection is the reasoning, is that choice still valid and absolute? The
defense that abortion is an absolute right, and an owed choice, is flawed in
its framing; choices are always present but consequences, however, are not. Something
that is illegal can still be perpetrated, but the justice system has structured
consequences to reduce the frequency and magnitude of a given transgression. Laws
inherently speak to the “right” action in a given condition. If abortion is the
inferior option, why is the law not obligated to match such sentiments?
If you are pro-life: I have
only seen this as the trepidation to preach or “push” your beliefs upon another
person for fear of impropriety or extremism. If instead of pregnant women in
cars going to Planned Parenthood, you saw mothers walking their 2 year olds in
and leaving alone, I believe your fears of speaking out and asserting your
beliefs would be given proper perspective in such issues of life and death.
5: You are truly glad I’m
alive because I am human and therefore inherently valuable, unlike the preborn.
Ultimately every discussion boils down to this decision. Are
the pre-born human and when, if at all, is abortion permitted? The most typical
line for personhood is birth and this is faulted because it cannot be applied.
It does not require being human to exit a birth canal upon fulfillment of
gestation, no uniquely human trait is found therein. Terminology such as embryo
and fetus along with the small size and number of cells existent at the time
are used to exhibit development as the qualifier. Fetus and embryo were never
intended to designate something or someone as sub-human, it is a mere
development/age association akin to child, teen etc. Even application of
development, be it age or physical condition cannot be evenly applied across
the pre-born or the born. If enforced, many people would lose their right to
life by simply not meeting the qualifications set forth by others. The only
undeniable facet of personhood is genetic makeup, and this is established upon
conception. Any other qualifying factor for one being human cannot be evenly
applied with any significance or without discrimination based on an arbitrary
and superficial line.
We must all thoroughly consider
the full and even application of the ideologies we espouse. I hope these
conversations can be had, for they are desperately needed. Please do so
civilly, but also full of honesty and passion.
Human life is inherently valuable and deserves protection, I
beg you to fight for it.
My name is Nicholas Charles D’Angelo, and my mother chose
life for me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Comment rules:
Please do not criticize or berate others you can disagree with their comments and views but please be an adult about things and don't resort to cursing, insulting, and name calling.
Please do not post any private information about yourself or others (i.e. email addresses, phone numbers, etc.)
Please be respectful, civil, and considerate.
The following is NOT allowed under any circumstances and will result in your comments being deleted and not published, and could result in you being banned from any further commenting.
No Blasphemy in any way shape or form this is a Christian owned blog.
No swearing, slandering, or threatening of any kind.
No insults of any religion, gender, race, will be allowed.
Any threats will be immediately reported to authorities.